Order:
  1.  30
    Clarifying Two Central Issues in Double Effect Reasoning Debates.Andrew M. Lang - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:279-292.
    The principles whereby the reason operates in ethically complicated situations has been subject to long-standing debates in Catholic Philosophy. A classic text which exemplifies this is Aquinas’s consideration of self-defensive killing. In this paper I clarify two central issues in double-effect reasoning debates surrounding this text. Both issues are connected to the seemingly simple but actually complex task of accounting for the “chosen means” of self-defense. The first issue is whether the “chosen means” are also able to be considered a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  11
    Clarifying Two Central Issues in Double Effect Reasoning Debates.Andrew M. Lang - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:279-292.
    The principles whereby the reason operates in ethically complicated situations has been subject to long-standing debates in Catholic Philosophy. A classic text which exemplifies this is Aquinas’s consideration of self-defensive killing. In this paper I clarify two central issues in double-effect reasoning debates surrounding this text. Both issues are connected to the seemingly simple but actually complex task of accounting for the “chosen means” of self-defense. The first issue is whether the “chosen means” are also able to be considered a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  11
    Reason in Context.Andrew M. Lang - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:279-292.
    The principles whereby the reason operates in ethically complicated situations has been subject to long-standing debates in Catholic Philosophy. A classic text which exemplifies this is Aquinas’s consideration of self-defensive killing. In this paper I clarify two central issues in double-effect reasoning debates surrounding this text. Both issues are connected to the seemingly simple but actually complex task of accounting for the “chosen means” of self-defense. The first issue is whether the “chosen means” are also able to be considered a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark